Miller v. Hart
This text of 33 N.E. 1009 (Miller v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action instituted by appellant against Samuel Hart, a person of unsound mind, and Alonzo Osborne his guardian, to recover compensation, in excess of three thousand five hundred dollars, for necessary boarding and care, furnished said ward under an agreement with a former guardian, by the terms of which appellant ivas to be paid therefor out of the estate of said ward, which is shown 'to be large.
The separate demurrer of each of the defendants was sustained to each paragraph of the complaint in the court below.
On. account of the amount involved, the jurisdiction of ‘this -case, on appeal, under the authorities, is in* the Supreme Court.
The clerk is accordingly directed to transfer the case to the .docket of the Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 N.E. 1009, 6 Ind. App. 557, 1893 Ind. App. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-hart-indctapp-1893.