Miller v. Hammers

51 Ill. 175
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1869
StatusPublished

This text of 51 Ill. 175 (Miller v. Hammers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Hammers, 51 Ill. 175 (Ill. 1869).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case turns upon a very simple point. By the testimony it appears defendant received a deed from the plaintiff for one hundred and fifty-three and sixty-eight hundredths acres of land, for which he gave his notes. On the last note the suit was brought.

How, there is no competent evidence in the record that the defendant did not get as much land as he bargained for, and as the deed calls for. The fact is proved, that a certain seven acres of land, adjoining the town of Panola, was not the property of the vendor when he sold, but belonged to another man, and although it was taken off the north end of the tract sold to defendant, there may have remained one hundred and fifty-three and sixty-eight hundreths acres conveyed by the deed.

The judgment must he reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Ill. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-hammers-ill-1869.