Miller v. Greenwalt

46 A. 1100, 64 N.J.L. 722, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 160
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 46 A. 1100 (Miller v. Greenwalt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Greenwalt, 46 A. 1100, 64 N.J.L. 722, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 160 (N.J. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error must be affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Collins in his opinion in the Supreme Court. See ante p. 197.

For affirmance—Depue (Chief Justice), Van Syckel, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 10.

For reversal—Magie (Chancellor). 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A. 1100, 64 N.J.L. 722, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-greenwalt-nj-1900.