Miller v. Greenspan
143 A.D. 914, 127 N.Y.S. 1132
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1911·Published
Opinion
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Defendant was not entitled to a lien upon plaintiff’s safe for storage charges. (Merritt v. Peirano, 10 App. Div. 563.) While defendant may have a cause of action in tort for a trespass upon his premises, this claim is not the proper subject of counterclaim in this action. (Bernheimer v. Hartmayer, 60 App. Div. 316.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Woodward, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Greenspan, 143 A.D. 914, 127 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
143 A.D. 914 (Miller v. Greenspan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merritt v. Peirano
10 A.D. 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Platt v. Finck
60 A.D. 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)