Miller v. Greenspan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Greenspan

143 A.D. 914, 127 N.Y.S. 1132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 143 A.D. 914 (Miller v. Greenspan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Greenspan, 143 A.D. 914, 127 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Defendant was not entitled to a lien upon plaintiff’s safe for storage charges. (Merritt v. Peirano, 10 App. Div. 563.) While defendant may have a cause of action in tort for a trespass upon his premises, this claim is not the proper subject of counterclaim in this action. (Bernheimer v. Hartmayer, 60 App. Div. 316.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Woodward, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Defendant was not entitled to a lien upon plaintiff’s safe for storage charges. (Merritt v. Peirano, 10 App. Div. 563.) While defendant may have a cause of action in tort for a trespass upon his premises, this claim is not the proper subject of counterclaim in this action. (Bernheimer v. Hartmayer, 60 App. Div. 316.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Woodward, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 A.D. 914, 127 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-greenspan-nyappdiv-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack