Miller v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Miller v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

785 N.E.2d 476, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1495

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 20, 2003

Docket2002-2066

StatusPublished

This text of 785 N.E.2d 476 (Miller v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 785 N.E.2d 476, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Stark App. No. 2002CA00058, 2002-Ohio-5763. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this ease, the court hereby allows the appeal.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated with Supreme Court case No. 2002-2188, Miller v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., Stark App. No. 2002CA00058, 2002-Ohio-5763, and held for the decision in Supreme Court case No. 2002-0610, Geren v. Westfield Ins. Co., Lucas App. No. L-01-1398, 2002-Ohio-1230.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule be stayed.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would allow only the cross-appeal. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stark App. No. 2002CA00058, 2002-Ohio-5763. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this ease, the court hereby allows the appeal.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated with Supreme Court case No. 2002-2188, Miller v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., Stark App. No. 2002CA00058, 2002-Ohio-5763, and held for the decision in Supreme Court case No. 2002-0610, Geren v. Westfield Ins. Co., Lucas App. No. L-01-1398, 2002-Ohio-1230.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule be stayed.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would allow only the cross-appeal. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 N.E.2d 476, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-grange-mut-cas-co-ohio-2003.