Miller v. Gorman
5 Blackf. 112, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 36
This text of 5 Blackf. 112 (Miller v. Gorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Miller v. Gorman, 5 Blackf. 112, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 36 (Ind. 1839).
Opinion
THE defendant moved the Court to instruct the jury that if certain facts were proved, they should be considered in mitigation of damages. The instruction was refused. Held, that as the record did not show that there was any evidence to support the hypothetical instruction asked for, the Court would presume the instruction to have been irrelevant to the testimony, and, of course, rightly refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Manly v. Hubbard
9 Ind. 230 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1857)
Woolley v. State
8 Ind. 502 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1857)
Sloan v. State
8 Ind. 312 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1856)
Wilson v. Wilson
4 Iowa 309 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1856)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Blackf. 112, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-gorman-ind-1839.