Miller v. Globe Manufacturing Co.
This text of 162 S.E. 925 (Miller v. Globe Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s injury seems to have resulted from one of those unfortunate accidents which was not anticipated and could not have been foreseen in the exercise of a reasonable prevision on the part of the defendant. Therefore, under the principles announced in Goddard v. Desk Co., 199 N. C., 22, 153 S. E., 608, Crisp v. Lumber Co., 199 N. C., 343, 154 S. E., 311, King v. Power Co., 198 N. C., 86, 150 S. E.,711, and Warwick v. Ginning Co., 153 N. C., 262, 69 S. E., 129, the judgment will be upheld.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 254, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-globe-manufacturing-co-nc-1932.