Miller v. Glen Falls Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Miller v. Glen Falls Insurance

764 P.2d 982, 94 Or. App. 264

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 30, 1988

DocketWCB 82-0210M; CA A45745

StatusPublished

This text of 764 P.2d 982 (Miller v. Glen Falls Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Glen Falls Insurance, 764 P.2d 982, 94 Or. App. 264 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant seeks review of the Board’s “Own Motion Order on Remand”¹ —dated August 21,1987, in which the Board ruled that claimant was not entitled to an award of permanent disability for “either his compensable 1970 head injury or his complex partial seizure disorder.” Employer agrees with claimant that the Board’s findings are insufficient for judicial review under ORS 656.298(6) and Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988).²

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant seeks review of the Board’s “Own Motion Order on Remand”¹ —dated August 21,1987, in which the Board ruled that claimant was not entitled to an award of permanent disability for “either his compensable 1970 head injury or his complex partial seizure disorder.” Employer agrees with claimant that the Board’s findings are insufficient for judicial review under ORS 656.298(6) and Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988).²

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 P.2d 982, 94 Or. App. 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-glen-falls-insurance-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack