Miller v. Gladden

377 P.2d 165, 233 Or. 174, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 490
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 31, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 377 P.2d 165 (Miller v. Gladden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Gladden, 377 P.2d 165, 233 Or. 174, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 490 (Or. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was a habeas corpus proceeding. In 1954 petitioner had been sentenced to a term of 15 years in the penitentiary upon conviction of the crime of burglary. In 1958 petitioner was released on parole. In 1961 the parole was revoked and petitioner was returned to confinement. Pursuant to ORS 144.390 the time spent on parole did not diminish the length of his sentence.

Petitioner claims ORS 144.390 attempts to vest judicial power in the State Board of Parole and Probation. He is wrong. The statute reads:

“A prisoner recommitted for violation of parole, conditional pardon or probation shall serve out his sentence, and the time during which he was out on parole is not a part thereof.”

The legislature has made the determination and the Board has no discretion. The statute is a proper exercise of legislative power. Greenwood v. Gladden, 1962, 373 P2d 417.

The order of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perkey v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
670 P.2d 1061 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)
Miller v. Gladden
228 F. Supp. 802 (D. Oregon, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 P.2d 165, 233 Or. 174, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-gladden-or-1962.