Miller v. Gilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Gilson

296 A.D.2d 551, 745 N.Y.S.2d 912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 22, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 296 A.D.2d 551 (Miller v. Gilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Gilson, 296 A.D.2d 551, 745 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In two related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of [552]*552an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), entered July 2, 2001, as, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition and transferred custody of the child to him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court’s award of custody of the subject child to the father had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Matter of Schmidt v Schmidt, 234 AD2d 465; Gage v Gage, 167 AD2d 332). Here, the Family Court properly determined that transferring custody to the father would be in the child’s best interests since he was more likely to encourage and facilitate liberal visitation with the mother and was the better parent to provide needed structure and stability for the child (see Eschbach v Eschbach, supra). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of [552]*552an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), entered July 2, 2001, as, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition and transferred custody of the child to him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court’s award of custody of the subject child to the father had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Matter of Schmidt v Schmidt, 234 AD2d 465; Gage v Gage, 167 AD2d 332). Here, the Family Court properly determined that transferring custody to the father would be in the child’s best interests since he was more likely to encourage and facilitate liberal visitation with the mother and was the better parent to provide needed structure and stability for the child (see Eschbach v Eschbach, supra). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 A.D.2d 551, 745 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-gilson-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack