Miller v. Fulton
47 Cal. 146
Opinion
It is well settled that an equitable defense interposed in an action of ejectment should contain in substance the elements of a bill in equity, and that its sufficiency, other than as to mere form, is to be determined by the application of the rules of pleading observed in courts of equity, when relief is sought there. (Bruck v. Tucker, 42 Cal. 352, and cases there cited.) Tested by this rule the equitable defense attempted here amounts to nothing.
Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed—remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Fulton, 47 Cal. 146 (Cal. 1873).
47 Cal. 146 (Miller v. Fulton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wade v. Howe
38 P.2d 439 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
McCall v. Superior Court
36 P.2d 642 (California Supreme Court, 1934)
Mayer v. West
273 P. 849 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Swanston v. Clark
95 P. 1117 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
Ming v. Foote
9 Mont. 201 (Montana Supreme Court, 1890)
De Arguello v. Bours
8 P. 49 (California Supreme Court, 1885)