Miller v. Franklin

80 S.E. 549, 14 Ga. App. 180
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 20, 1914
Docket5219
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 549 (Miller v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Franklin, 80 S.E. 549, 14 Ga. App. 180 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1. The question as to whether certain guano was furnished by the landlord, or by another, being a matter of fact, for determination by the jury, and there being sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict foreclosing the landlord’s lien, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial. Henderson v. Hughes, 4 Ga. App. 53 (69 S. E. 813).

2. As appears from the judgment refusing a new trial, the matters dealt with in the disallowed amendment to the answer had been passed upon in a former suit between the same parties. “A judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive between the same parties . . as to all matters put in issue, or which under the rules of law might have been put in issue in the cause wherein the judgment was rendered.” Civil Code, § 4336. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hood v. Cooledge
147 S.E. 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Phillips v. Freeman
118 S.E. 404 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.E. 549, 14 Ga. App. 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-franklin-gactapp-1914.