Miller v. Foltis Fisher, Inc.
This text of 152 Misc. 24 (Miller v. Foltis Fisher, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint herein sounded solely in contract, although the damages sought were for personal injuries arising out of breach of a warranty implied in connection with the sale of food for human consumption. In view of the comprehensive language of the statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 480) we think that interest was properly allowed on the verdict from the date of the breach to the date of trial.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.
All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 Misc. 24, 272 N.Y.S. 712, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-foltis-fisher-inc-nyappterm-1934.