Miller v. Foltis Fisher, Inc.
152 Misc. 24, 272 N.Y.S. 712, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1420
Opinion
The complaint herein sounded solely in contract, although the damages sought were for personal injuries arising out of breach of a warranty implied in connection with the sale of food for human consumption. In view of the comprehensive language of the statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 480) we think that interest was properly allowed on the verdict from the date of the breach to the date of trial.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.
All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Foltis Fisher, Inc., 152 Misc. 24, 272 N.Y.S. 712, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
152 Misc. 24 (Miller v. Foltis Fisher, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gillespie v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
26 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Gellman v. Hotel Corp. of America
46 Misc. 2d 521 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1965)
Employees' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Empire City Iron Works, Inc.
19 Misc. 2d 963 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Brown v. Godefroy Manufacturing Co.
278 A.D. 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
E. R. Squibb & Sons Inter-American Corp. v. Springmeier Shipping Co.
194 Misc. 813 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Hall v. Florida Greyhound Lines, Inc.
191 Misc. 509 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)