Miller v. Fickett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Miller v. Fickett

432 Mass. 1028

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedNovember 21, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 432 Mass. 1028 (Miller v. Fickett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Fickett, 432 Mass. 1028 (Mass. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

A judge in the Superior Court entered summary judgment against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendants Remax New Horizons and Suanne DeFrancesco (defendants). The Appeals Court affirmed the judgment, holding that the defendants did not breach any duty to the plaintiffs. Miller v. Fickett, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 654 (2000). We granted the plaintiffs’ application for further appellate review.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Appeals Court, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A judge in the Superior Court entered summary judgment against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendants Remax New Horizons and Suanne DeFrancesco (defendants). The Appeals Court affirmed the judgment, holding that the defendants did not breach any duty to the plaintiffs. Miller v. Fickett, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 654 (2000). We granted the plaintiffs’ application for further appellate review.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Appeals Court, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

432 Mass. 1028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-fickett-mass-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack