Miller v. Fenton

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14
CourtSaratoga Chancery Court
DecidedApril 2, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14 (Miller v. Fenton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Fenton, 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Opinion

Decided that the part .satisfaction of a demand by one of two joint debtors, and a covenant by the creditor not to enforce the residue of the claim by execution against his individual property is not a technical release which can be set up by the other debtor as a bar to the suit for such demand; unless the party released was the one who was primarily or individually liolden for the whole demand.

That in a case of wrong doers the complainant may recover against any one of them, for the whole loss; and they will have no claim to contribution.

That an order to set up the defence that the demand of the complainant has been discharged by the release of a defendant after answer put in, a cross bill in the nature of a plea puis darrein continuance is necessary.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-fenton-nychanctsara-1844.