Home/Ohio Court of Appeals/Miller v. Fairley

Miller v. Fairley

37 Ohio Law. Abs. 379
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1942·No. No. 19056·Published

Opinions

OPINION

Upon hearing, it was stipulated and agreed by and between counsel, that the recital of facts in the opinion of the trial court should be considered as supplemental to the agreed statement of facts on file.

The judgment of the "court of common pleas is therefore affirmed. Exceptions may be noted.

MORGAN, J. & SKEEL, J., concur. LIEGHLEY, PJ., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Fairley, 37 Ohio Law. Abs. 379 (Ohio Ct. App. 1942).

37 Ohio Law. Abs. 379 (Miller v. Fairley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.