Miller v. Fairley
37 Ohio Law. Abs. 379
This text of 37 Ohio Law. Abs. 379 (Miller v. Fairley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Miller v. Fairley, 37 Ohio Law. Abs. 379 (Ohio Ct. App. 1942).
Opinions
OPINION
Upon hearing, it was stipulated and agreed by and between counsel, that the recital of facts in the opinion of the trial court should be considered as supplemental to the agreed statement of facts on file.
The judgment of the "court of common pleas is therefore affirmed. Exceptions may be noted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
37 Ohio Law. Abs. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-fairley-ohioctapp-1942.