Miller v. Fairfax Circuit Court

D.C. Circuit

Miller v. Fairfax Circuit Court

296 F. App'x 89

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 2, 2008·No. No. 08-5070·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court [90]*90for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed March 12, 2008, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s action without prejudice on the ground that the complaint did not comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004); see also Salahuddin v. Cuomo, 861 F.2d 40, 42 (2d Cir. 1988). The dismissal without prejudice allows appellant to file a new complaint that meets the requirements of Rule 8(a). See Ciralsky, 355 F.3d at 669-70.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court [90]*90for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed March 12, 2008, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s action without prejudice on the ground that the complaint did not comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004); see also Salahuddin v. Cuomo, 861 F.2d 40, 42 (2d Cir. 1988). The dismissal without prejudice allows appellant to file a new complaint that meets the requirements of Rule 8(a). See Ciralsky, 355 F.3d at 669-70.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Miller v. Fairfax Circuit Court, 296 F. App'x 89 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Pincite

296 F. App'x 89 (Miller v. Fairfax Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related