Miller v. Executors of Miller

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Miller v. Executors of Miller

1 S.C. Eq. 111

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedDecember 15, 1784

StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C. Eq. 111 (Miller v. Executors of Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Executors of Miller, 1 S.C. Eq. 111 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1784).

Pincite

Opinion

The master’s report was read, whereupon ordered, that the masicEs report he confirmed, and that the executors pay the seventy pounds sterling, assessed (as (lower) with interest from the 23d November, 1783, in March next. That the defendants, Bernard Beckman asid Tho-ns ¡is Harvey pay one-third of the money assessed on the respective sinus due by then», with interest, and give- bend with security for the remainder, payable the first day of Jammy, 178(5, with interest: And that the executors do-gay all the costs at law and in equity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The master’s report was read, whereupon ordered, that the masicEs report he confirmed, and that the executors pay the seventy pounds sterling, assessed (as (lower) with interest from the 23d November, 1783, in March next. That the defendants, Bernard Beckman asid Tho-ns ¡is Harvey pay one-third of the money assessed on the respective sinus due by then», with interest, and give- bend with security for the remainder, payable the first day of Jammy, 178(5, with interest: And that the executors do-gay all the costs at law and in equity.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 S.C. Eq. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-executors-of-miller-ctchansc-1784.