Miller v. Eastern Railroad

17 F. Cas. 314, 27 Leg. Int. 188, 7 Phila. 597, 1870 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided May 12, 1870·Published

Opinion

CADWALADER, District Judge.

If either party has the right to complain of my consulting assessors in this case, the libellant is the party. If the assessors had answered my question differently, I might not have been able to decide the case without a commission to new assessors. As the matter stands, I concur in the opinion of the assessors.

Decree for libellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Eastern Railroad, 17 F. Cas. 314, 27 Leg. Int. 188, 7 Phila. 597, 1870 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236 (E.D. Pa. 1870).

17 F. Cas. 314 (Miller v. Eastern Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.