Miller v. Duff Man's 24HR Towing & Recovery, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. Duff Man's 24HR Towing & Recovery, LLC

571 S.W.3d 643

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 12, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106497

StatusPublished

This text of 571 S.W.3d 643 (Miller v. Duff Man's 24HR Towing & Recovery, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Duff Man's 24HR Towing & Recovery, LLC, 571 S.W.3d 643 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*644Bennie Miller appeals from the judgment entered in this court-tried case dismissing his rent-and-possession claim and granting Terrence Stocking's counterclaim for specific performance of an oral contract to purchase the property at issue. The judgment is not against the weight of the evidence and is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. We affirm. Stocking's motion for attorney fees and costs is denied without prejudice.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*644Bennie Miller appeals from the judgment entered in this court-tried case dismissing his rent-and-possession claim and granting Terrence Stocking's counterclaim for specific performance of an oral contract to purchase the property at issue. The judgment is not against the weight of the evidence and is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. We affirm. Stocking's motion for attorney fees and costs is denied without prejudice.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 S.W.3d 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-duff-mans-24hr-towing-recovery-llc-moctapp-2019.