Miller v. Dixie Gardens Condominium Ass'n

534 So. 2d 918, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2696, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427, 1988 WL 131693
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 13, 1988
DocketNo. 88-874
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 534 So. 2d 918 (Miller v. Dixie Gardens Condominium Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Dixie Gardens Condominium Ass'n, 534 So. 2d 918, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2696, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427, 1988 WL 131693 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reconsider our earlier denial of appel-lee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Upon further considiration, we find that the order on motion for summary judgment is a non-final, nonappealable order, Bravo Elec. Co. v. Carter Elec. Co., 522 So.2d 480 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); see White Palms of Palm Beach, Inc. v. Fox, 525 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), and interrelated issues remain to be tried. See Gassner v. Caduceus Self Ins. Fund, Inc., 532 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Auth. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 469 So.2d 813 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review denied, 482 So.2d 349 (Fla.1986).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice to the institution of a plenary appeal upon entry of a final judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marquez v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.
534 So. 2d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 So. 2d 918, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2696, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427, 1988 WL 131693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-dixie-gardens-condominium-assn-fladistctapp-1988.