Miller v. Dew

Fourth Circuit

Miller v. Dew

539 F. App'x 125

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2013·No. No. 13-1404·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roy E. Miller appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claims against several defendants on grounds of immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Parrish, No. 3:12-cv-00873-HEH (E.D.Va. Feb. 13, 2013; Mar. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roy E. Miller appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claims against several defendants on grounds of immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Parrish, No. 3:12-cv-00873-HEH (E.D.Va. Feb. 13, 2013; Mar. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Miller v. Dew, 539 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

539 F. App'x 125 (Miller v. Dew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.