Miller v. Cunningham
318 F. App'x 186
Opinion
Larry Miller and the 11th Senatorial District Republican Committee appeal the district court’s order denying their 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) (2000) motion for attorneys’ fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Cunningham, 564 F.Supp.2d 555 (2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Cunningham, 318 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2009).
318 F. App'x 186 (Miller v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Cunningham
564 F. Supp. 2d 555 (E.D. Virginia, 2008)