Miller v. Cunningham

318 F. App'x 186
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2009·No. No. 08-1742·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry Miller and the 11th Senatorial District Republican Committee appeal the district court’s order denying their 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) (2000) motion for attorneys’ fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Cunningham, 564 F.Supp.2d 555 (2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Cunningham, 318 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2009).

318 F. App'x 186 (Miller v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Cunningham
564 F. Supp. 2d 555 (E.D. Virginia, 2008)