Miller v. Cramer

26 S.E. 657, 48 S.C. 282, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 100
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 10, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 26 S.E. 657 (Miller v. Cramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Cramer, 26 S.E. 657, 48 S.C. 282, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 100 (S.C. 1897).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice McIver.

These two cases, together with another brought by the same plaintiffs against Horatio C. Hughes (the last named, case not being involved in this appeal), all growing ont of the same state of facts substantially, and involving the same principles of law, -were heard [298]*298and considered together by his Honor, Judge Benet, and from his decree the defendants in the two cases named in the title have appealed.

The facts are so fully and clearly stated in the Circuit decree, and the conclusions reached by the Circuit Judge are so satisfactorily vindicated by the reasoning which he has employed and the authorities which he has cited in his decree (which should be incorporated in the report of this case), that it would be a mere work of supererogation for this Court to add anything to what is there so well said. The Circuit decree is, therefore, adopted as the opinion of this Court.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in the two cases named in the title be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sales International Ltd. v. Black River Farms, Inc.
242 S.E.2d 432 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1978)
Horne v. Cox
115 S.E.2d 513 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)
Brevard v. FORTUNE
69 S.E.2d 355 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1952)
Graniteville Co. v. Williams
39 S.E.2d 202 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1946)
Reid v. Kier
152 P.2d 417 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
Wells v. Coursey
15 S.E.2d 752 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
Varser v. Smith
197 S.E. 394 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)
Dutton v. Davis
156 A. 531 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1931)
Weston v. Morgan
160 S.E. 436 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
In Re Estate of Hager
235 N.W. 563 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1931)
Ellis v. Johnson
141 S.E. 564 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)
Kirton v. Howard
134 S.E. 859 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
R. E. L. McCaskill Co. v. Dekle
102 So. 252 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Kurtz v. Gramenz
198 Iowa 222 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
Buchan v. German American Land Co.
180 Iowa 911 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)
Powers v. Smith
61 S.E. 222 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.E. 657, 48 S.C. 282, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-cramer-sc-1897.