Miller v. Commissioner

1960 T.C. Memo. 92, 19 T.C.M. 475, 1960 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 199
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMay 9, 1960
DocketDocket No. 63322.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1960 T.C. Memo. 92 (Miller v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Commissioner, 1960 T.C. Memo. 92, 19 T.C.M. 475, 1960 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 199 (tax 1960).

Opinion

Herman J. Miller v. Commissioner.
Miller v. Commissioner
Docket No. 63322.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1960-92; 1960 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 199; 19 T.C.M. (CCH) 475; T.C.M. (RIA) 60092;
May 9, 1960
*199

Petitioner acquired from the owners an option to purchase certain lands. The total purchase price under the option was $85,800. Subsequently, petitioner caused the land to be conveyed to a third party for a total consideration of $382,050. The third party paid petitioner the purchase price and received a deed directly from the owners. Petitioner paid the owners the purchase price under the option.

Held: In substance and in fact, petitioner sold the land itself to the third party and not the option and the gain resulting is taxable as a short-term capital gain.

Held further: Petitioner may offset against that part of the purchase price received in each of the years 1950 and 1951 only the amounts he actually paid to the owners in those years.

Held further: Amounts deductible for travel and miscellaneous expenses in connection with the sale, determined.

Held further: Additions to tax under section 294(d)(2) denied.

G. D. Walker, Esq., P.O. Box 24, Jonesboro, Ark., Jacob Rabkin, Esq., Alvin D. Lurie, Esq., for petitioner. Douglas M. Moore, Esq., for respondent.

BRUCE

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

BRUCE, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in income tax and additions *200 to tax of petitioner for the calendar years 1950 and 1951 as follows:

Additions to Tax
CalendarIncome TaxSec. 294Sec. 294
YearDeficiency(d)(1)(A)(d)(2)
1950$116,036.81
195123,284.65$2,557.98$1,397.08

The following issues are before the Court for decision: (1) Whether the gains accruing to petitioner from the sale of certain property, a part of which gains was received in the taxable year 1950 and a part in the taxable year 1951, are taxable to petitioner as long-term capital gains or as ordinary income, or, alternatively, as short-term capital gains; (2) how much of these gains is attributable to the taxable year 1950 and how much is attributable to the taxable year 1951; (3) the amount of travel and miscellaneous expenses of petitioner which is properly deductible from the sale proceeds to determine net gain; and (4) whether petitioner is liable for addition to tax in 1951 under section 294(d)(2), Internal Revenue Code of 1939. All the other issues raised in the pleadings have been disposed of by written or oral stipulations.

Findings of Fact

The stipulated facts are found.

Petitioner is an individual with residence at Batesville, Arkansas. His income tax returns for the calendar years *201 1950 and 1951 were prepared on the cash basis of accounting and were filed with the collector of internal revenue at Little Rock, Arkansas. Petitioner did not file a declaration of estimated tax in 1951. Petitioner became interested in manganese mining in 1939, and in 1949, he was president of Southern Mining and Manganese Company, which company owned and operated manganese properties located near Batesville, Arkansas. Petitioner also owned an interest in manganese properties adjoining those of Southern Mining and Manganese Company through membership in the Eagan Syndicate.

On April 25, 1949, approximately 2,600 acres of additional manganese lands adjoining those of Southern Mining and Manganese Company were owned by J. Reed Denison and members of his family. These lands are hereinafter referred to as the Denison property. Actual title to these lands was spread among J. Reed Denison, his wife, Lottie May Denison, Lucille D. Jones, F. Ross Denison, Anita Denison, Walter L. Denison, Louise Denison, A. Milne Denison, Thelma Denison, Alvis F. Denison, Marie Denison, Shell D. Denison, Carmen Denison, Mary Irene White, and Sabelle Peters. All of these people are hereinafter referred to collectively *202 as the Denisons. J. Reed Denison had a power of attorney from all of these people, excepting Lottie Denison, his wife, and Lucille D. Jones, giving him broad powers in handling their interests in the Denison property.

On April 25, 1949, J. Reed Denison, individually, his wife, Lottie Denison, Lucille D. Jones, and J. Reed Denison, as attorney in fact for all the other Denisons, executed a document labeled "Option to Purchase," hereinafter referred to as the option, in which they, as owners, granted to petitioner, in his individual capacity, as purchaser, an exclusive right and option to purchase specifically described parts of the Denison property totaling approximately 2,600 acres. This option provided further:

"Said owners also hold title to undivided mineral interests in scattered fortys, list of which will be furnished upon request, and in the event purchaser desired to purchase any of same, owners will convey same for additional sum of $7.50 per acre.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commissioner v. Acker
361 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
39 F.2d 540 (Second Circuit, 1930)
Blick v. Commissioner
31 T.C. 611 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)
Scales v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 1024 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)
Rees v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 698 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)
Shea v. Commissioner
24 B.T.A. 798 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1931)
Butler v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 1005 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)
Barber v. United States
115 F. Supp. 349 (D. Minnesota, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1960 T.C. Memo. 92, 19 T.C.M. 475, 1960 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-commissioner-tax-1960.