Miller v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Court of Appeals of Texas

Miller v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

252 S.W.3d 425, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 8709, 2003 WL 22311214

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 9, 2003

Docket01-03-00212-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 252 S.W.3d 425 (Miller v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 252 S.W.3d 425, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 8709, 2003 WL 22311214 (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 30, 2002. Appellant has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court by filing a notice of appeal, but he has not paid the appellate filing fee. On March 28, 2003, this Court ordered that unless, within 15 days of the date of the order, appellant paid the appellate filing fee, his appeal would be dismissed. The 15 days have expired and appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex.R.Afp. P. 42.3(b), (c).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 30, 2002. Appellant has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court by filing a notice of appeal, but he has not paid the appellate filing fee. On March 28, 2003, this Court ordered that unless, within 15 days of the date of the order, appellant paid the appellate filing fee, his appeal would be dismissed. The 15 days have expired and appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex.R.Afp. P. 42.3(b), (c).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 S.W.3d 425, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 8709, 2003 WL 22311214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-commission-for-lawyer-discipline-texapp-2003.