Miller v. City of Bradford
Opinion
We find no error in this record. The learned court was [168]*168clearly right in refusing to sustain defendant’s objection to the offer of evidence recited in the first specification, and- also in refusing to affirm the point, for charge, quoted in the second. The two remaining specifications must also be overruled. The testimony properly before the jury was quite sufficient to require submission of the case to them; and that was fairly and impartially done in a charge that is fully adequate and free from substantial error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
40 A. 409 (Miller v. City of Bradford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.