Miller v. City of Bradford

40 A. 409, 186 Pa. 164, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 974
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 16, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 229·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find no error in this record. The learned court was [168]*168clearly right in refusing to sustain defendant’s objection to the offer of evidence recited in the first specification, and- also in refusing to affirm the point, for charge, quoted in the second. The two remaining specifications must also be overruled. The testimony properly before the jury was quite sufficient to require submission of the case to them; and that was fairly and impartially done in a charge that is fully adequate and free from substantial error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. City of Bradford, 40 A. 409, 186 Pa. 164, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 974 (Pa. 1898).

40 A. 409 (Miller v. City of Bradford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koerth v. Turtle Creek Borough
49 A.2d 398 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Jackson v. City of Grand Forks
140 N.W. 718 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1913)