Miller v. City of Andalusia

Alabama Court of Appeals

Miller v. City of Andalusia

107 So. 41, 21 Ala. App. 253, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 48

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 9, 1926

Docket4 Div. 190.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 So. 41 (Miller v. City of Andalusia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. City of Andalusia, 107 So. 41, 21 Ala. App. 253, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 48 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating an ordinance of the city of Andalusia.

The case originated in the recorder’s court of said city, and, appealing from his conviction there to the circuit court of Covington county, the appellant was put to trial upon a complaint filed in said circuit court charging him in substance and effect with possessing or disposing of prohibited intoxicating liquors “against the laws and ordinances of the city of Andalusia.” The complaint was subject to the demurrers interposed, and the court erred in overruling them. Benjamin v. City of Montgomery, 78 So. 167, 16 Ala. App. 389; Rosenberg v. City of Selma, 52 So. 742, 168 Ala. 195; Bouyer v. City of Bessemer, 88 So. 192, 17 Ala. App. 665.

There was no error in admitting in [ evidence the city ordinance involved. Code 1923, § 2000.

The other questions presented will not likely arise on another trial.

For the error indicated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating an ordinance of the city of Andalusia.

The case originated in the recorder’s court of said city, and, appealing from his conviction there to the circuit court of Covington county, the appellant was put to trial upon a complaint filed in said circuit court charging him in substance and effect with possessing or disposing of prohibited intoxicating liquors “against the laws and ordinances of the city of Andalusia.” The complaint was subject to the demurrers interposed, and the court erred in overruling them. Benjamin v. City of Montgomery, 78 So. 167, 16 Ala. App. 389; Rosenberg v. City of Selma, 52 So. 742, 168 Ala. 195; Bouyer v. City of Bessemer, 88 So. 192, 17 Ala. App. 665.

There was no error in admitting in [ evidence the city ordinance involved. Code 1923, § 2000.

The other questions presented will not likely arise on another trial.

For the error indicated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 So. 41, 21 Ala. App. 253, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-city-of-andalusia-alactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack