Miller v. Cincinnati (City)

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 383
Ohio Circuit Courts·Decided March 15, 1898·Published

Opinion

Swing, J.

This is an action to enjoin the collection of a certain assessment for the construction of a sewer, on the ground that the lot in question is exempt under the statute on account of being provided with local drainage or does not need it. It seems to us that the statute should be more explicit in this regard; that it should be more definite in pointing out the limitations of the lots to be assessed. As it stands now, whether a lot needs drainage or has drainage must be largely a question of opinion merely, and not regulated by any fixed standard. In our opinion the lot in question here is subject to the assessment and is not exempt either on the ground that it does not need drainage or has local drainage.

The petition will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Cincinnati (City), 8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 383 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 383 (Miller v. Cincinnati (City)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.