Miller v. Carlton
This text of 194 F. 1022 (Miller v. Carlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The theory upon which this cause was heard by the referee, and the order by him passed and confirmed by the judge, in which the "petitioner was ordered, upon pain of imprisonment for contempt, to surrender a stock of goods, or, in the alternative, to pay the value of the same, within 20 days from the date of the order, were in direct conflict with the views of this court as expressed in Samel v. Dodd, 142 Fed. 68, 73 C. C. A. 254; and therefore, upon the authority of that case, the order should be, and it is hereby, reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 F. 1022, 114 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-carlton-ca5-1912.