Miller v. Cambria Car Wash, LLC

68 A.D.3d 827, 889 N.Y.2d 483
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 827 (Miller v. Cambria Car Wash, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Cambria Car Wash, LLC, 68 A.D.3d 827, 889 N.Y.2d 483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

[828]*828CPLR 305 (b) provides, in relevant part, that when a summons is served without a complaint, the summons shall contain “a notice stating the nature of the action and the relief sought.” Here, the plaintiffs summons contained the following notice: “The" nature of this action is to recover money damages for negligence; negligence per se. The relief sought is $25 Million Dollars in damages.”

Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court and the defendant’s contentions, the language in this summons complied with the statutory requirements, and adequately apprised the defendant of the nature of the action and the relief sought (see Grace v Bay Crane Serv. of Long Is., Inc., 12 AD3d 566 [2004]; Darrow v Krzys, 261 AD2d 778 [1999]; Fitzpatrick v Slagowitz, 201 AD2d 614 [1994]; Rowell v Gould, Inc., 124 AD2d 995 [1986]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Balkin, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GILEWICZ, THOMAS v. BUFFALO GENERAL PSYCHIATRIC UNIT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Gilewicz v. Buffalo General Psychiatric Unit
118 A.D.3d 1298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 827, 889 N.Y.2d 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-cambria-car-wash-llc-nyappdiv-2009.