Miller v. California

418 U.S. 915, 94 S. Ct. 3206, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1158, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2182
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided July 25, 1974·No. No. 73-1508·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinions

Appeal from App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Orange, dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state ban on obscenity is prohibited by the First Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would note jurisdiction and reverse the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. California, 418 U.S. 915, 94 S. Ct. 3206, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1158, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2182 (1974).

418 U.S. 915 (Miller v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

640 Broadway Renaissance Co. v. Cuomo
740 F. Supp. 1023 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1988
Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1988
Hopfmann v. Connolly
471 U.S. 459 (Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Manzo
573 P.2d 945 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1977)
Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst
256 N.W.2d 808 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1977)
Miller v. California
551 F.2d 1168 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
Miller v. People Of The State Of California
551 F.2d 1168 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
B & P DEVELOPMENT v. Walker
420 F. Supp. 704 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
Eagle Books, Inc. v. Reinhard
418 F. Supp. 345 (N.D. Illinois, 1976)
State v. Cimino
366 A.2d 1168 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1976)
Gould v. People
56 Cal. App. 3d 909 (California Court of Appeal, 1976)
Bloom v. Municipal Court
545 P.2d 229 (California Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. Magee
353 A.2d 184 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1975)
Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. Rizzo
524 F.2d 571 (Third Circuit, 1975)