Miller v. Byrd

106 S.E. 192, 26 Ga. App. 307, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 119

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 15, 1921·No. 11659·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the undisputed evidence, as outlined in the statement of facts below, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bill, JJ., concur. B. B. Qhasiain, L. B. Heath, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Quincey, 'contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Byrd, 106 S.E. 192, 26 Ga. App. 307, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

106 S.E. 192 (Miller v. Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.