Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Miller v. Byrd

Miller v. Byrd

106 S.E. 192, 26 Ga. App. 307, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 119
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1921
Docket11659
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 106 S.E. 192 (Miller v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Byrd, 106 S.E. 192, 26 Ga. App. 307, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinions

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the undisputed evidence, as outlined in the statement of facts below, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bill, JJ., concur. B. B. Qhasiain, L. B. Heath, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Quincey, 'contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davison v. Allen
276 P. 43 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1929)
American National Bank of Beaver Dam v. Clark
207 N.W. 756 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.E. 192, 26 Ga. App. 307, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-byrd-gactapp-1921.