Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.

277 A.D.2d 985

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 985 (Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp., 277 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful discharge, (1) order denying appellant’s motion to strike out the second separate defense in the amended answer as insufficient in law, and (2) order modifying a notice of examination before trial and a subpoena duces tecum, etc., insofar as appeals are taken, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1006.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for wrongful discharge, (1) order denying appellant’s motion to strike out the second separate defense in the amended answer as insufficient in law, and (2) order modifying a notice of examination before trial and a subpoena duces tecum, etc., insofar as appeals are taken, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1006.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-burlington-mills-ribbon-corp-nyappdiv-1950.