Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.

277 A.D.2d 985

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 278 A.D. 854 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 1950·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful discharge, (1) order denying appellant’s motion to strike out the second separate defense in the amended answer as insufficient in law, and (2) order modifying a notice of examination before trial and a subpoena duces tecum, etc., insofar as appeals are taken, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1006.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for wrongful discharge, (1) order denying appellant’s motion to strike out the second separate defense in the amended answer as insufficient in law, and (2) order modifying a notice of examination before trial and a subpoena duces tecum, etc., insofar as appeals are taken, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1006.]

Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp., 277 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

277 A.D.2d 985 (Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.