Miller v. Bulkley

85 Miss. 706
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 85 Miss. 706 (Miller v. Bulkley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Bulkley, 85 Miss. 706 (Mich. 1904).

Opinion

Truly., J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment of the court in sustaining the plea of res judicata, as presented by the record, was manifestly correct. The identical question arising upon the same contract had already been adjudicated in another suit between the same parties, in the same tribunal, at a previous term; and the judgment in the former suit, which was adverse to the appellant, had been satisfied and paid. Every element necessary to constitute a prior adjudication exists in this record.. This is conclusive against the appellant. The contention of appellant that an issue of fact necessitating a submission to the jury was raised by his replication to the plea of res adjudicaba filed by the appellee is untenable, and does violence to well-established rules of pleading. The plea of res adjudicaba must be tried by, and decided solely upon, the record as presented.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Viator v. Stone
29 So. 2d 274 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1947)
Darrow v. Moore
142 So. 447 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)
Von Zondt v. Town of Braxton
115 So. 557 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Miss. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-bulkley-miss-1904.