Miller v. Bevard
Opinion
| Miller v Bevard |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 05471 |
| Decided on September 30, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
753 CA 21-01178
v
ERIC BEVARD, GRETCHEN BEVARD AND DAVID STROTHERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
PAPPAS, COX, KIMPEL, DODD & LEVINE, P.C., SYRACUSE (THOMAS P. GIVAS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
MELVIN & MELVIN, PLLC, SYRACUSE (ROGER W. BRADLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS ERIC BEVARD AND GRETCHEN BEVARD.
SLYE LAW OFFICES, P.C., WATERTOWN (ROBERT J. SLYE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT DAVID STROTHERS.
Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.) entered June 21, 2021. The order and judgment, among other things, dismissed the amended complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: September 30, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
208 A.D.3d 1652 (Miller v. Bevard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.