Miller v. Bell

7 Ark. 135

Opinion

Mr. Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action upon a writing obligatory, signed M. S. Miller. The plaintiff declared against Mathew S. Miller. The only point presented was, whether, upon oyer, there was a variance between the bond given on oyer and the declaration. The precise point was discussed and settled at the present term in the case of Rector vs. Taylor & Gardiner. It is there held that this is no variance.

Let the judgment of the Circuit Court be, in all things, affirmed.