Miller v. Beeler

114 F. App'x 583
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 10, 2004·No. No. 04-7035·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Theodore Timothy Miller appeals the district court’s order denying him appointment of counsel and dismissing as frivolous his claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named, Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Beeler, No. CA-03-774-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed April 29, 2004; entered April 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Beeler, 114 F. App'x 583 (4th Cir. 2004).

114 F. App'x 583 (Miller v. Beeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related