Miller v. Beadle
This text of 36 N.W. 165 (Miller v. Beadle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Complainant filed a judgment creditor’s bill on an execution, returned unsatisfied, against John A. Beadle, to reach securities transferred to Mrs. Beadle, as so transferred in fraud of creditors.
The case is purely one of fact. The court below found the transfer was not fraudulent. The testimony of both defendants shows it was made for a valuable consideration, and this is not contradicted. We are asked to infer fraud from some suspicious circumstances in spite of the testimony to the contrary. Upon a review of all the facts, we do not think the fraud made out.
The decree must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 N.W. 165, 65 Mich. 643, 1887 Mich. LEXIS 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-beadle-mich-1887.