Miller v. Beadle

36 N.W. 165, 65 Mich. 643, 1887 Mich. LEXIS 648
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 1887·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.

Complainant filed a judgment creditor’s bill on an execution, returned unsatisfied, against John A. Beadle, to reach securities transferred to Mrs. Beadle, as so transferred in fraud of creditors.

The case is purely one of fact. The court below found the transfer was not fraudulent. The testimony of both defendants shows it was made for a valuable consideration, and this is not contradicted. We are asked to infer fraud from some suspicious circumstances in spite of the testimony to the contrary. Upon a review of all the facts, we do not think the fraud made out.

The decree must be affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Beadle, 36 N.W. 165, 65 Mich. 643, 1887 Mich. LEXIS 648 (Mich. 1887).

36 N.W. 165 (Miller v. Beadle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Timmer v. Pietrzyk
261 N.W. 313 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Webb
90 Ala. 185 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Barrett v. Lowrey
43 N.W. 1065 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1889)