Miller v. Barnard

215 P. 1113, 113 Kan. 631, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 177
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided June 9, 1923·No. No. 24,511·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by a taxpayer to enjoin collection of taxes assessed against his land for the benefit of a school district. He was defeated, and appeals.

[632] The land was formerly a part of school district No. 64. For failure to maintain school, proceedings were taken to disorganize the district, and to attach' it to district No. 68. After the proceedings were completed, the taxes were regularly assessed by proper authority. The contention is, the proceedings were ineffectual, and district No. 64 was not disorganized and did not become attached to district No. 68. The plaintiff is not authorized to litigate these questions. (Oil & Gas Co. v. Board of Education, 112 Kan. 737, 212 Pac. 900. and cases cited in the opinion.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Barnard, 215 P. 1113, 113 Kan. 631, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 177 (kan 1923).

215 P. 1113 (Miller v. Barnard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Euler v. Rossville Drainage District
235 P. 95 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)
School District No. 38 v. Rural High School District No. 6
225 P. 732 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1924)