Miller v. Bannister

54 N.J. Eq. 701
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 N.J. Eq. 701 (Miller v. Bannister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Bannister, 54 N.J. Eq. 701 (N.J. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West Hudson County Trust Co. v. Wichner
187 A. 579 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 N.J. Eq. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-bannister-nj-1896.