Miller v. Bank/Suncoast

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miller v. Bank/Suncoast

416 So. 2d 54, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20470

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 7, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2122

StatusPublished

This text of 416 So. 2d 54 (Miller v. Bank/Suncoast) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Bank/Suncoast, 416 So. 2d 54, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only meritorious point raised by appellant is that the trial court erred by granting a final summary judgment in this mortgage foreclosure without requiring ap-pellee to file in evidence appellant’s note. We affirm the judgment of the trial court; however, prior to any order of sale, appellee shall file in evidence in this case appellant’s original promissory note. See Telephone Utility Terminal Co. v. EMC Industries, Inc., 404 So.2d 183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

OTT, C. J., and SCHEB and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only meritorious point raised by appellant is that the trial court erred by granting a final summary judgment in this mortgage foreclosure without requiring ap-pellee to file in evidence appellant’s note. We affirm the judgment of the trial court; however, prior to any order of sale, appellee shall file in evidence in this case appellant’s original promissory note. See Telephone Utility Terminal Co. v. EMC Industries, Inc., 404 So.2d 183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

OTT, C. J., and SCHEB and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

416 So. 2d 54, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-banksuncoast-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack