Miller v. Bank/Suncoast

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miller v. Bank/Suncoast

416 So. 2d 54, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20470

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 1982·No. No. 81-2122·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only meritorious point raised by appellant is that the trial court erred by granting a final summary judgment in this mortgage foreclosure without requiring ap-pellee to file in evidence appellant’s note. We affirm the judgment of the trial court; however, prior to any order of sale, appellee shall file in evidence in this case appellant’s original promissory note. See Telephone Utility Terminal Co. v. EMC Industries, Inc., 404 So.2d 183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

OTT, C. J., and SCHEB and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only meritorious point raised by appellant is that the trial court erred by granting a final summary judgment in this mortgage foreclosure without requiring ap-pellee to file in evidence appellant’s note. We affirm the judgment of the trial court; however, prior to any order of sale, appellee shall file in evidence in this case appellant’s original promissory note. See Telephone Utility Terminal Co. v. EMC Industries, Inc., 404 So.2d 183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

OTT, C. J., and SCHEB and SCHOON-OVER, JJ., concur.

Miller v. Bank/Suncoast, 416 So. 2d 54, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

416 So. 2d 54 (Miller v. Bank/Suncoast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related