Home/California Supreme Court/Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.

Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.

154 P.3d 997, 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471, 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3851, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2990, 2007 Cal. LEXIS 2503
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 21, 2007
DocketS149178
StatusPublished

This text of 154 P.3d 997 (Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA., 154 P.3d 997, 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471, 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3851, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2990, 2007 Cal. LEXIS 2503 (Cal. 2007).

Opinion

56 Cal.Rptr.3d 471 (2007)
154 P.3d 997

MILLER (Paul)
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.

No. S149178.

Supreme Court of California.

March 21, 2007.

Petition for review granted.

The applications to appear as counsel pro hac vice are granted.

CHIN, J., was recused and did not participate.

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 P.3d 997, 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471, 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3851, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2990, 2007 Cal. LEXIS 2503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-bank-of-america-nt-sa-cal-2007.