Home/California Supreme Court/Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.

Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.

154 P.3d 997, 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471, 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3851, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2990, 2007 Cal. LEXIS 2503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cal. 4th 630 →
California Supreme Court·Decided March 21, 2007·No. S149178·Published

Opinion

56 Cal.Rptr.3d 471 (2007)
154 P.3d 997

MILLER (Paul)
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.

No. S149178.

Supreme Court of California.

March 21, 2007.

Petition for review granted.

The applications to appear as counsel pro hac vice are granted.

CHIN, J., was recused and did not participate.

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA., 154 P.3d 997, 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471, 2007 Daily Journal DAR 3851, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2990, 2007 Cal. LEXIS 2503 (Cal. 2007).

154 P.3d 997 (Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.