Miller v. Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Miller v. Anderson

189 Ill. App. 72

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 8, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,849

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 189 Ill. App. 72 (Miller v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Anderson, 189 Ill. App. 72 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and error, § 578*—Amendment of 1911 to section 81 of Practice Act construed. The Amendment of 1911 to section 81 of the Practice Act, J. & A. ¶ 8681, merely inserts a provision for an alternative method of presenting questions for review in the form of a “stenographic report’’ of the trial, and does not have the effect of abolishing the former rule which requires formal exceptions, and the same to be preserved in the bill of exceptions, where the party chooses the bill-of-exceptions method of review. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 27*—when hill of exceptions cannot he treated as stenographic report. Failure of bill of exceptions to show that any exception was taken to the judgment of the Municipal Court cannot be cured by treating the bill as a stenographic report where it appears on its face not to be a stenographic report.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and error, § 578*—Amendment of 1911 to section 81 of Practice Act construed. The Amendment of 1911 to section 81 of the Practice Act, J. & A. ¶ 8681, merely inserts a provision for an alternative method of presenting questions for review in the form of a “stenographic report’’ of the trial, and does not have the effect of abolishing the former rule which requires formal exceptions, and the same to be preserved in the bill of exceptions, where the party chooses the bill-of-exceptions method of review. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 27*—when hill of exceptions cannot he treated as stenographic report. Failure of bill of exceptions to show that any exception was taken to the judgment of the Municipal Court cannot be cured by treating the bill as a stenographic report where it appears on its face not to be a stenographic report.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 Ill. App. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-anderson-illappct-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack