Miller v. Allstate Insurance Company
Opinion
William MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and
PT Works, Inc., Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to determine whether PT Works may properly be incorporated solely under the Business Corporations Act and not the Professional Services Corporations Act, and, once that determination is made, to reconsider (if necessary) whether physical therapy provided by PT Works was "lawfully rendered" under MCL 500.3157.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
728 N.W.2d 458 (Miller v. Allstate Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.