Miller v. Alabama
181 L. Ed. 2d 395, 132 S. Ct. 548, 565 U.S. 1013, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7959, 80 U.S.L.W. 3280
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 7, 2011·No. No. 10-9646·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama granted. The case is to be argued in tandem with No. 10-9647, Jackson v. Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, immediately infra.
Same case below, 63 So. 3d 676.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Alabama, 181 L. Ed. 2d 395, 132 S. Ct. 548, 565 U.S. 1013, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 7959, 80 U.S.L.W. 3280 (U.S. 2011).
181 L. Ed. 2d 395 (Miller v. Alabama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Coia
168 A.3d 219 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.
163 A.3d 410 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Songster v. Beard
35 F. Supp. 3d 657 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2014)
Commonwealth v. Batts
66 A.3d 286 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
State v. Riley
58 A.3d 304 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
Musser v. Mapes
854 F. Supp. 2d 652 (S.D. Iowa, 2012)
State of Iowa v. Jeffrey K. Ragland
812 N.W.2d 654 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2012)
Bear Cloud v. State
2012 WY 16 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2012)
Arrington v. State
113 So. 3d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Gray v. State
267 P.3d 667 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 2011)