Miller v. Acorn Refining Co.

125 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 828, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 212
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 12, 1924·Published

Opinion

Pee OueiaM.

The first assignment of error is as follows: “Exceptions 1 to 16, inclusive, relate to the introduction of evidence. (R, pp. 6 to 14, inclusive.)” And the third assignment of error is of the same tenor. Ye are precluded from considering these exceptions, as they do not comply with the rules of practice prescribed for the presentation of exceptions on appeal. Rules are of no value unless they are to be observed uniformly and without exception, in the absence of some valid reason therefor. Leonard v. Davis, 187 N. C., 471.

The defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintifE’s- evidence, was properly overruled.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Acorn Refining Co., 125 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 828, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 212 (N.C. 1924).

125 S.E. 926 (Miller v. Acorn Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leonard v. . Davis
122 S.E. 16 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)