Miller v. Acorn Refining Co.
This text of 125 S.E. 926 (Miller v. Acorn Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The first assignment of error is as follows: “Exceptions 1 to 16, inclusive, relate to the introduction of evidence. (R, pp. 6 to 14, inclusive.)” And the third assignment of error is of the same tenor. Ye are precluded from considering these exceptions, as they do not comply with the rules of practice prescribed for the presentation of exceptions on appeal. Rules are of no value unless they are to be observed uniformly and without exception, in the absence of some valid reason therefor. Leonard v. Davis, 187 N. C., 471.
The defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintifE’s- evidence, was properly overruled.
The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 828, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-acorn-refining-co-nc-1924.