Miller v. Acheson Industries Inc.

276 A.D.2d 449, 715 N.Y.S.2d 145, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11020

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered on or about June 4, 1999, which granted defendants-respondents’ motions and cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We affirm the grant of summary judgment to defendants-respondents herein for the same reasons that we affirmed the grants of summary judgment in favor of the defendants-respondents in Miller v Amerada Hess Corp. (276 AD2d 447 [decided herewith]) and Miller v Amerada Hess Corp. (276 AD2d 448 [decided herewith]). Here, as in those cases, the Jones Act “survival” causes are time-barred. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Acheson Industries Inc., 276 A.D.2d 449, 715 N.Y.S.2d 145, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 449 (Miller v. Acheson Industries Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Amerada Hess Corp.
276 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Miller v. Amerada Hess Corp.
276 A.D.2d 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)