Miller & Underhill v. Vaughan

1 Johns. 315
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

Where a cause is referred by consent, the court will not listen to an application to set aside the report. We interpose only where the cause has been referred by a rule of court, pursuant to the statute. The parties are left to the same remedy, as in the case of a mere submission to arbitrators. The court have no controul over referees, voluntarily chosen by the parties. It is also admitted that this was not a proper case for a reference under the act. It was decided in November term last, that the court would not interfere in such a case.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller & Underhill v. Vaughan, 1 Johns. 315 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

1 Johns. 315 (Miller & Underhill v. Vaughan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Healy v. Gilman
6 Rob. 479 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1866)