Miller, Terry Louis

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 7, 2012
DocketWR-37,856-17
StatusPublished

This text of Miller, Terry Louis (Miller, Terry Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller, Terry Louis, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. WR-37,856-16 and 17
EX PARTE TERRY LOUIS MILLER, Applicant


ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 30,298-A-H-7 and 30,600-A-H-7 IN THE 188th DISTRICT COURT

FROM GREGG COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a felon and he was sentenced to, respectively, forty years' and ten years' imprisonment.

In both of these applications, Applicant raises five grounds for challenging each conviction. These applications, however, present a more serious question. This Court's records reflect that Applicant has filed six prior applications challenging each of these convictions. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant's claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. These applications are dismissed.

Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Louise Pearson, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals, not to accept or file the instant applications for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future applications attacking these convictions unless Applicant is able to show in such applications that any claims presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in previous applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

A copy of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.



Filed: March 7, 2012

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. United States
373 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Ex Parte Bilton
602 S.W.2d 534 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Carr
511 S.W.2d 523 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miller, Terry Louis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-terry-louis-texcrimapp-2012.